TIGed

Switch headers Switch to TIGweb.org

Are you an TIG Member?
Click here to switch to TIGweb.org

HomeHomeExpress YourselfPanoramaTerrorism and the Nuclear race
Panorama
a TakingITGlobal online publication
Search



(Advanced Search)

Panorama Home
Issue Archive
Current Issue
Next Issue
Featured Writer
TIG Magazine
Writings
Opinion
Interview
Short Story
Poetry
Experiences
My Content
Edit
Submit
Guidelines




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Terrorism and the Nuclear race Printable Version PRINTABLE VERSION
by Agbedejobi patrick niyi, Nigeria Apr 18, 2007
Peace & Conflict   Opinions

  

We might now take George Bush at his word: in the wake of the September 11 attacks, he named three nations as the “axis of evil”: North Korea, Iran and Iraq. The statement had a solid tripartite ring to it, conjuring images of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan. The implication was chilling: that Axis, we might remember, damn near overran the world.

“North Korea,” Bush then said, “is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens.” Iran, he explained, “aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people’s hope for freedom.” When it came to Iraq, Bush was oddly careful, saying it “had plotted to develop anthrax, and nerve gas, and nuclear weapons for over a decade.” Had plotted. We are now, some five years later, left with the realization that thinking about acquiring weapons of mass destruction will get you attacked (if you’re Iraq), while actually having them will lead to negotiations — as is the case with North Korea.
In truth, this is not an incoherent theory of deterrence: the Soviet Union had some 20,000 nuclear warheads aimed at us during the cold war and we spent our time fighting them in Nicaragua, Chile, the Congo, Vietnam — in other words, in places where our vital interests were not threatened in the slightest. In fact, we fought them on every continent in the world, except Europe, where our vital interests actually were threatened. But we should not think Bush’s words are a kind of historical conceit; we fought the Axis by first knocking off its lightweight contender, Italy. So too, we thought, we would do with Iraq. It was the “axis of evils” Italy. More simply, as one of my colleagues has described it, the Bush administration went after Iraq because they thought it would be a pushover, “a Grenada with goats”. Such glibness is well-placed, for it shows that among the gibberish being uttered by Bush’s most important policymakers, there is a sense that perhaps America is not the all-powerful hegemon its class of neo-conservatives would have us believe.
At the beginning of the movie “Patton” — a classic, played nearly every night on some television somewhere in America — the great and strutting general faces his troops. “Men,” he says, “this stuff we hear about America wanting to stay out of the war — not wanting to fight — is a lot of bullshit. Americans love to fight — traditionally. All real Americans love the sting and clash of battle.” No we don’t. At the height of World War II, when we and our allies were bumping up against the German army, the American army had the highest desertion rate of any fighting force in the European theater. Dwight Eisenhower was enraged; there were tens of thousands of men wandering around behind the lines, “separated from their units”. (British commanders, by the way, often referred to the Americans as … “our Italians”.) That is to say: we didn’t invade Iraq because we thought they had weapons of mass destruction. We invaded Iraq because we knew they didn’t. By this through-the-looking-glass logic, the only nations and movements worth attacking are those that are the least capable of hitting back. That sounds glib, but it is supported by the facts. During his recent address before the United Nations Security Council, Bush laid out a new axis of evil — Hamas and Hezbollah (this is, it seems, the “axis of not quite as evil, but still evil”). Hamas and Hezbollah were each mentioned three times. Al-Qaeda, the movement that attacked the World Trade Center and killed thousands of Americans was mentioned once. Once. North Korea was never mentioned.





 1     


Tags

You must be logged in to add tags.

Writer Profile
Agbedejobi patrick niyi


This user has not written anything in his panorama profile yet.
Comments
You must be a TakingITGlobal member to post a comment. Sign up for free or login.